|
Date: 31 March 2004
Subject: Water and Life on Mars
Martian life has always been a source of science fiction, and water
central to ideas of Martian life. In 1858 Fr Pierre Angelo Secchi made
some observations, showing mottled green patches on a pink background. In
his 1863 colour map of the planet he labelled certain vague streak-like
features he observed as "canali". or "channels".
The eminent
Italian astronomer Giovanni Schiaparelli (1835-1910) used the same term as
he produced his map of Mars. Actually Schiaparelli was colour blind and
effectively produced a chart rather than a picture – albeit the "canali"
do look very regular and sharply defined.

The words "canali" just means "channels", but when the American
Percival Lowell referred to them the word "canals" implied a conscious
design origin. Lowell began from a kind of Spencerian social Darwinism,
more Lamarckian than really Darwinian, with notions of an upward thrust of
life. A view that life, even intelligent life, existed elsewhere was
certainly not, however, anti-Christian, indeed it was the dominant view
amongst Christians (even those sceptical of Lowell). Lowell, however, saw
the seasonally changing polar caps of Mars as remainders of ice sheets,
and the canals as the attempts of intelligent Martians to preserve and
distribute the remaining water in a planet which was gradually losing it.
Astronomers divided between those who could "see" the canals and those who
couldn't. The idea, however, inspired generations of sci fi writers,
including H.G.Wells in his famous "War of the Worlds".
Late 20th century work proved that there are no large scale canals on
Mars, but speculation has remained as to whether or not there was or at
least had been water there. NASA aimed their 2004 space mission to see if
their rover could find out, eg, whether its target site was a one time
lake bed or just somewhere covered in volcanic ash. Now the data sent by
the NASA rovers seem to have shown that there once was indeed water on
Mars. The rover Opportunity has found various things which make it look as
though there was water, in particular finding an unusual
amber-yellow-brown mineral made of potassium iron sulfate hydroxide
(jarosite) which apparently forms only in water.
If there was, indeed, water, then possibly there could have existed at
least the kind of microbes that are thought to have once dominated
terrestrial life. In purely scientific terms we really have little idea
how likely this would be. Since we know very little about any exact
biochemical path which could have led step by step to our existing DNA
based replicating life forms, assessing its likelihood "by chance" is very
difficult. Those who simply assume that it "must have happened" have
little basis for it.
On the theological level we also have little to guide us. The most
common Christian view in the nineteenth century (taken eg by David
Brewster) was that God would not have created so vast a universe just to
leave it empty – so there very probably were other life forms on other
planets, elsewhere if not in our own solar system. Scripture, however,
really does not indicate anything one way or the other. Perhaps God, as C
S Lewis famously put it for Aslan in his Narnia books, would simply say "I
tell no one any story but their own". To us it is of interest in itself,
but has no obvious theological implications one way or the other.
|