|
Date: 27 May 2003
Subject: SARS
Recently the SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome) has been in the
news as it brings illness and in some instances death around the world.
In early March, the World Health Organization (WHO) issued a global
alert about as it brings illness and in some instances death around the
world.
In early March, the World Health Organization (WHO) issued a global
alert about SARS, and it seems to be spreading. It is not yet quite
certain what is causing it, though the smart money is on a virus, and the
incubation period seems to be about 3-7 days. Treatment has been a bit
hit-and-miss, because of the uncertainty. Most of those who have developed
the symptoms have been in some prolonged contact with those with it, and
it does not seem highly infectious. What may therefore be surprising is
the reaction to the outbreak, and the rapid sale of face masks etc. In
this instance the panic seems excessive to the actual threat, the virus
(assuming this is what it is) seems to spread only in large droplets
coughed out, and not as easily as general 'flu. However, it has underlined
the problem that the World Health Organisation lacked any real power to
insist that the outbreak (which was initially largely amongst hospital
staff) was dealt with properly when the problem was containable. As with
many such issue, a base problem is the reluctance of the US to be
accountable to anyone (eg in giving the WHO rights to access and inspect
procedures in any country at short notice in the event of a serious
infections outbreak) - and if they refuse to sign a treaty it is often
dead in the water.
In the Bible there may be instances of epidemics. For example, 2 Kings
19:35 sounds very like an epidemic. It could, of course, have been some
kind of direct supernatural miraculous alteration in natural events, but
if we think that it may have been an epidemic then this is not at all be
to deny the biblical account, but to suggest that God may work through
nature. Our modern world-view tends not to approach disasters like this,
but to see natural causes as operating purposelessly. There are, here,
issues for Christians to think through. Plainly illness is not to be seen
purely as a punishment for specific sin. Wrong actions or lifestyles can,
of course lead to suffering both for the person concerned and for others.
The aids virus was spread through lifestyles which were largely through
sexual or drug-use deviance from any Christian norm. Innocent babies,
however, also suffer from the virus as a result of parental lifestyle, so
we need to be very careful with any straightforward blame culture. When
Jesus, moreover, was asked the cause of the affliction of blindness in one
man he told his disciples that they were asking the wrong question (John
9:2). The real issue was what to do about it to bring God glory, not how
it happened. What Christians should be doing is to work to give the WHO
greater powers to actually act rather than only to advise. This is not
talking "politics" it is about using the God-given knowledge of science to
protect and enhance people's health. If the price of doing this is mutual
accountability then it is not too high a price to pay.
|